JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 3, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Jorge Alonso Flechas Diaz Vs Consejo Superior De La Carrera Notarial·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Contra Sentencias Proferidas Por Salas De Revision
  • Reiteración de jurisprudencia
  • Requisitos formales de procedencia
Incidente De Nulidad
  • Improcedencia en procesos que se adelantan ante la Corte Constitucional
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Denegar en sentencia T-241/08 por pretender reabrir debate sobre el requisito de documentos originales en concurso de notarios
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia de la referencia.

La Sala concluye que no se incurrió en ninguna causal de nulidad, se decide denegar la solicitud.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. DENEGAR la nulidad de la sentencia T-241 de 2008, proferida el 6 de marzo de 2008 por la entonces Sala Sexta de Revision.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.